Evidence Center
Evidence before assertion
2 of 6 control evidence records are verified. Open any record to see exactly how much it adds to Evidence Confidence and why. Unverified external statements are labelled "Not publication-ready".
MFA enforcement export from identity provider
- Provenance / reference
- Internal export — identity admin console
- Issuer
- Nordvik Logistik ApS (fictional demo)
- Published / effective
- Not recorded
- Checked date
- 2026-09-14
- Version
- Export v3
- Owner
- IT Lead
- Reviewer
- Operations Lead (demo)
- Linked finding / control
- F-AC_1
Why this record scores what it does
This record is worth 96% of full credit for its control. Here is where the points come from:
| Dimension | This record | Earns | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source & authority | Customer/Internal Evidence · Internal/Customer | 80% of 20 | 16.0 |
| Verification | Verified | 100% of 35 | 35.0 |
| Freshness | Current (0–90 days) — checked 17 days ago | 100% of 25 | 25.0 |
| Confidence | high | 100% of 20 | 20.0 |
| Total (out of 100) | 96.0 | ||
Freshness measured on 2026-10-01. Settings from methodology v0.2; they are EvidentraIQ choices, not regulatory requirements.
Backup restore test record
- Provenance / reference
- Internal ticket LOG-2291
- Issuer
- Nordvik Logistik ApS (fictional demo)
- Published / effective
- Not recorded
- Checked date
- 2026-06-02
- Version
- v1
- Owner
- IT Lead
- Reviewer
- Managing Director (demo)
- Linked finding / control
- F-CY_1
Why this record scores what it does
This record is worth 67% of full credit for its control. Here is where the points come from:
| Dimension | This record | Earns | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source & authority | Customer/Internal Evidence · Internal/Customer | 80% of 20 | 16.0 |
| Verification | Needs review | 50% of 35 | 17.5 |
| Freshness | Recent (91–180 days) — checked 121 days ago | 80% of 25 | 20.0 |
| Confidence | medium | 65% of 20 | 13.0 |
| Total (out of 100) | 66.5 | ||
Freshness measured on 2026-10-01. Settings from methodology v0.2; they are EvidentraIQ choices, not regulatory requirements.
Supplier register (draft)
- Provenance / reference
- Draft worksheet, not yet owner-approved
- Issuer
- Nordvik Logistik ApS (fictional demo)
- Published / effective
- Not recorded
- Checked date
- Not recorded
- Version
- draft
- Owner
- Operations Lead
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Linked finding / control
- F-TP_1
Why this record scores what it does
This record is worth 27% of full credit for its control. Here is where the points come from:
| Dimension | This record | Earns | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source & authority | Customer/Internal Evidence · Internal/Customer | 80% of 20 | 16.0 |
| Verification | Unverified | 10% of 35 | 3.5 |
| Freshness | Never checked | 0% of 25 | 0.0 |
| Confidence | low | 35% of 20 | 7.0 |
| Total (out of 100) | 26.5 | ||
Freshness measured on 2026-10-01. Settings from methodology v0.2; they are EvidentraIQ choices, not regulatory requirements.
AI acceptable use guidance for staff
- Provenance / reference
- Internal document, version pending approval
- Issuer
- Nordvik Logistik ApS (fictional demo)
- Published / effective
- Not recorded
- Checked date
- Not recorded
- Version
- 0.9
- Owner
- Managing Director
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Linked finding / control
- F-AI_5
Why this record scores what it does
This record is worth 27% of full credit for its control. Here is where the points come from:
| Dimension | This record | Earns | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source & authority | Customer/Internal Evidence · Internal/Customer | 80% of 20 | 16.0 |
| Verification | Unverified | 10% of 35 | 3.5 |
| Freshness | Never checked | 0% of 25 | 0.0 |
| Confidence | low | 35% of 20 | 7.0 |
| Total (out of 100) | 26.5 | ||
Freshness measured on 2026-10-01. Settings from methodology v0.2; they are EvidentraIQ choices, not regulatory requirements.
Data processing agreement — primary cloud supplier
- Provenance / reference
- Signed agreement held by Operations Lead
- Issuer
- Nordvik Logistik ApS (fictional demo)
- Published / effective
- Not recorded
- Checked date
- 2026-08-21
- Version
- 2026 edition
- Owner
- Operations Lead
- Reviewer
- Managing Director (demo)
- Linked finding / control
- F-TP_1
Why this record scores what it does
This record is worth 96% of full credit for its control. Here is where the points come from:
| Dimension | This record | Earns | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source & authority | Customer/Internal Evidence · Internal/Customer | 80% of 20 | 16.0 |
| Verification | Verified | 100% of 35 | 35.0 |
| Freshness | Current (0–90 days) — checked 41 days ago | 100% of 25 | 25.0 |
| Confidence | high | 100% of 20 | 20.0 |
| Total (out of 100) | 96.0 | ||
Freshness measured on 2026-10-01. Settings from methodology v0.2; they are EvidentraIQ choices, not regulatory requirements.
Retention schedule for customer records
- Provenance / reference
- Not yet produced
- Issuer
- Nordvik Logistik ApS (fictional demo)
- Published / effective
- Not recorded
- Checked date
- Not recorded
- Version
- —
- Owner
- Managing Director
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Linked finding / control
- F-DP_2
Why this record scores what it does
The document does not exist yet, so this record contributes 0%. Every dimension is multiplied by zero until the document is produced.
| Dimension | This record | Earns | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source & authority | Customer/Internal Evidence · Internal/Customer | 80% of 20 | 0.0 |
| Verification | Unverified | 10% of 35 | 0.0 |
| Freshness | Never checked | 0% of 25 | 0.0 |
| Confidence | low | 35% of 20 | 0.0 |
| Total (out of 100) | 0.0 | ||
Freshness measured on 2026-10-01. Settings from methodology v0.2; they are EvidentraIQ choices, not regulatory requirements.
Draft marketing statement: "Regulators expect SMEs to document staff AI use."
- No source reference recorded.
- No checked date.
- Not verified.
- Provenance / reference
- Not recorded
- Issuer
- Not recorded
- Published / effective
- Not recorded
- Checked date
- Not recorded
- Version
- draft
- Owner
- Managing Director
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Linked finding / control
- Not linked to a control
Why this record scores what it does
This is an external statement, not proof of a control, so it does not count toward Evidence Confidence.
Source types we distinguish
- LAWLaw/Regulation
- Published legislation or regulation text.
- GUIDEOfficial Guidance
- Guidance issued by a public authority or regulator.
- STDStandard/Framework
- Recognised standards or frameworks (e.g. ISO, NIST).
- STATOfficial Statistics
- Official statistics publications from a national or international statistics body.
- RESInternational Institution Research
- Research or surveys by international institutions (e.g. OECD). Evidence, not official statistics and not law.
- PEERPeer-Reviewed Research
- Research published after independent peer review.
- INDIndustry Evidence
- Vendor, analyst or industry body reports.
- INTCustomer/Internal Evidence
- The organisation's own records: exports, tickets, policies, contracts, supplier agreements.
- EIQEvidentraIQ Analysis
- Our own derived analysis. Never presented as external fact.
Contracts, supplier agreements and other customer-provided documents are always Customer/Internal Evidence — never Law/Regulation.
An external factual, regulatory or research statement is publication-ready only with a source reference, a checked date, a source type and a verified status. Customer/Internal Evidence supports your own posture but is never the authority for an external claim.
File upload and an immutable evidence vault are planned for the Ultimate package and are not implemented in this version.